OBJECTIVES Optimal management of significant mitral regurgitation (SMR) during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement remains uncertain. This study evaluates the effect of untreated pre-op SMR on outcomes following LVAD… Click to show full abstract
OBJECTIVES Optimal management of significant mitral regurgitation (SMR) during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement remains uncertain. This study evaluates the effect of untreated pre-op SMR on outcomes following LVAD implant. METHODS Adults undergoing primary LVAD placement from April 2004 to May 2017 were included. Most recent pre-op transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was used to divide patients into an SMR group with moderate or greater regurgitation, and a group without SMR. Patients underwent LVAD implant without correction of SMR. Primary endpoint was 3-year post-operative survival, with secondary endpoints of length of stay (LOS), resolution of SMR following LVAD on post-discharge (30 day) TTE, and 1-year TTE. RESULTS LVAD placement was performed in 270 patients, 172 (63.7%) without SMR and 98 (36.3 %) with SMR. There were no differences in co-morbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and renal disease. Pre-op ejection fraction was similar, but a higher pulmonary vascular resistance was recorded in the SMR group (3.6 vs 3.0 Wood Units, p=0.048). There was no difference in 3-year mortality between the 2 cohorts (log-rank p=0.0.803). The SMR group had decreased LOS (median 19.5 vs 22 days, p=0.009). Of the 98 SMR patients, 91 (92.9 %) had resolution of SMR to less than moderate at 30 days. At 1 year, 15% of those with pre-operative SMR had recurrent SMR. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing LVAD placement with pre-op SMR experience no differences in mortality, and a majority experience resolution of MR after implant. Longer-term SMR recurrence and need for mitral intervention with LVAD implant warrant further investigation.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.