LAUSR

&NA; Proper ligament tension in knee flexion within cruciate‐retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty has long been associated with clinical success; however, traditional balancing principles have assumed that the distal femoral joint line (DFJL) affects only extension. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect DFJL may have on ligament strains and tibiofemoral kinematics of CR knee designs in flexion. A computational analysis was performed using a musculoskeletal modeling system for two different knee implants, the high‐flex CR (HFCR) and guided‐motion CR (GMCR). Tibiofemoral kinematics and ligament strain were measured at 90‐degree knee flexion while the implants' DFJL was incrementally shifted proximally. Femoral implant position and kinematics were used to determine the femur's anteroposterior position relative to the tibia. The change in the femoral medial condyle position relative to the tibia was 0.33 mm and 0.53 mm more anterior per each 1‐mm elevation of the DFJL for HFCR and GMCR, respectively. The change in the lateral condyle position was 0.20 mm more anterior and 0.06 mm more posterior for HFCR and GMCR, respectively. The strain in the lateral and medial collateral ligaments changed minimally with elevation of the DFJL. In both implants, strain increased in the anterior lateral and posterior medial bundles of the posterior collateral ligament with elevation of the DFJL, whereas strain decreased in the iliotibial band and iliotibial patellar band. Our findings suggest that DFJL affects ligament tension at 90‐degree knee flexion and therefore flexion balance for CR implants. Elevating the DFJL to address tight extension space in a CR knee while flexion space is well balanced could result in increased flexion tension especially when the flexion‐extension mismatch is large. To achieve balanced flexion and extension, the amount of DFJL elevation may need to be reduced.