The dominant view in the theory of fluid turbulence assumes that, once the effect of the Reynolds number is negligible, moments of order n of the longitudinal velocity increment, (… Click to show full abstract
The dominant view in the theory of fluid turbulence assumes that, once the effect of the Reynolds number is negligible, moments of order n of the longitudinal velocity increment, ( δ u), can be described by a simple power-law r ζ n, where the scaling exponent ζn depends on n and, except for ζ 3 ( = 1 ), needs to be determined. In this Letter, we show that applying Holder's inequality to the power-law form ( δ u ) n ¯ ∼ ( r L ) ζ n (with r / L ⪡ 1; L is an integral length scale) leads to the following mathematical constraint: ζ 2 p = p ζ 2. When we further apply the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, a particular case of Holder's inequality, to | ( δ u ) 3 ¯ | with ζ 3 = 1, we obtain the following constraint: ζ 2 ≤ 2 / 3. Finally, when Holder's inequality is also applied to the power-law form ( | δ u | ) n ¯ ∼ ( r L ) ζ n (this form is often used in the extended self-similarity analysis) while assuming ζ 3 = 1, it leads to ζ 2 = 2 / 3. The present results show that the scaling exponents predicted by the 1941 theory of Kolmogorov in the limit of infinitely large Reynolds number comply with Holder's inequality. On the other hand, scaling exponents, except for ζ3, predicted by current small-scale intermittency models do not comply with Holder's inequality, most probably because they were estimated in finite Reynolds number turbulence. The results reported in this Letter should guide the development of new theoretical and modeling approaches so that they are consistent with the constraints imposed by Holder's inequality.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.