LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Cryopreservation of epididymal and ejaculated bull spermatozoa

The present study was undertaken to assess viability of frozen–thawed bull semen collected from the bull’s ejaculate and cauda epididymis. A total of 30 ejaculates were collected from three bulls… Click to show full abstract

The present study was undertaken to assess viability of frozen–thawed bull semen collected from the bull’s ejaculate and cauda epididymis. A total of 30 ejaculates were collected from three bulls twice per week for 5 weeks (Control). Caudal epididymis were collected from slaughtered beef cattle of unknown origin from the local abattoir. Caudal epididymal sperm was recovered immediately after slaughtering (EP-0 h) and after cooling at 5°C for 24 h (EP-24). The epididymal and ejaculated samples were each pooled together before being extended with Triladyl. Diluted samples per treatment were loaded into a 0.25-mL French straw and cooled to 5°C in 4 h. Cooled straws were placed 4 cm above liquid nitrogen to freeze for 10 min. Frozen straws were immersed into LN2 and kept for 7 days at −196°C. Samples were analysed immediately after dilution and post-thawing using the computer aided sperm analysis for sperm motility rate, viability and acrosome defects. The highest sperm motility rates were observed with EJ-0 h before and after cryopreservation. However, the difference in sperm motility parameters between EP-0 h and EP-24 h evaluated before and after freezing was not significant (P > 0.05). Furthermore, no significant difference in live cells mean values was observed between the three samples on freezing (P > 0.05). In relation to spermatozoa acrosome defects, there was no significant difference observed among the three samples before and on freezing (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the results from the present study revealed that cooling of epididymides at 5°C for 24 h before the recovery of sperm cells was efficient in preserving epididymal sperm viability. However, ejaculated bull spermatozoa had higher sperm motility and viability rate than epididymal sperm.

Keywords: ejaculated bull; sperm motility; viability; epididymal ejaculated; bull spermatozoa

Journal Title: Animal Production Science
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.