LAUSR

Significance Bleb-driven cell migration plays important roles in diverse biological processes. Here, we present the mechanism for polarity establishment and maintenance in blebbing cells in vivo. We show that actin polymerization defines the leading edge, the position where blebs form. We show that the cell front can direct the formation of the rear by facilitating retrograde flow of proteins that limit the generation of blebs at the opposite aspect of the cell. Conversely, localization of bleb-inhibiting proteins at one aspect of the cell results in the establishment of the cell front at the opposite side. These antagonistic interactions result in robust polarity that can be initiated in a random direction, or oriented by a chemokine gradient. To study the mechanisms controlling front-rear polarity in migrating cells, we used zebrafish primordial germ cells (PGCs) as an in vivo model. We find that polarity of bleb-driven migrating cells can be initiated at the cell front, as manifested by actin accumulation at the future leading edge and myosin-dependent retrograde actin flow toward the other side of the cell. In such cases, the definition of the cell front, from which bleb-inhibiting proteins such as Ezrin are depleted, precedes the establishment of the cell rear, where those proteins accumulate. Conversely, following cell division, the accumulation of Ezrin at the cleavage plane is the first sign for cell polarity and this aspect of the cell becomes the cell back. Together, the antagonistic interactions between the cell front and back lead to a robust polarization of the cell. Furthermore, we show that chemokine signaling can bias the establishment of the front-rear axis of the cell, thereby guiding the migrating cells toward sites of higher levels of the attractant. We compare these results to a theoretical model according to which a critical value of actin treadmilling flow can initiate a positive feedback loop that leads to the generation of the front-rear axis and to stable cell polarization. Together, our in vivo findings and the mathematical model, provide an explanation for the observed nonoriented migration of primordial germ cells in the absence of the guidance cue, as well as for the directed migration toward the region where the gonad develops.