LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Watchman 2.5TM versus Watchman FLXTM device in atypical left atrial anatomies: old fashion never dies

Photo by kutanural from unsplash

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is recognised as an alternative to long-term anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and contraindication to systemic oral anticoagulation. The… Click to show full abstract

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is recognised as an alternative to long-term anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and contraindication to systemic oral anticoagulation. The new generation of WATCHMAN device, the WATCHMAN FLX, is designed to treat a wider range of left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomies and sizes compared to the previous iteration, the WATCHMAN 2.5. Indeed, a recent study showed that WATCHMAN FLX implantation either in patients with a prior failed attempt with WATCHMAN 2.5 or with a LAA anatomy judged to be unfavourable remains safe and highly effective [1]. However, when facing particular anatomical features or procedural challenges, the WATCHMAN 2.5 may be useful and complementary to the newest generation device. Herein, we illustrate some cases in which the use of the WATCHMAN 2.5 device facilitated procedural success despite challenging LAA anatomies.

Keywords: watchman 5tm; versus watchman; watchman; 5tm versus; device; left atrial

Journal Title: Acta Cardiologica
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.