LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Sub-pixel vs. super-pixel-based greenspace mapping along the urban–rural gradient using high spatial resolution Gaofen-2 satellite imagery: a case study of Haidian District, Beijing, China

Photo from wikipedia

ABSTRACT Greenspace in urban areas is closely related to urban ecosystems, economy, culture, and society. Recently, rapid urban development and expansion are always dominated by a series of human–environment interactions,… Click to show full abstract

ABSTRACT Greenspace in urban areas is closely related to urban ecosystems, economy, culture, and society. Recently, rapid urban development and expansion are always dominated by a series of human–environment interactions, which can lead to various spatial patterns of urban greenspace especially along the urban–rural gradient. Urban–rural greenspace mapping is therefore of great importance to provide a comprehensive insight for urban planners and managers. In our study, we adopted both the sub-pixel and super-pixel strategies to map the greenspace in Haidian District, Beijing, China. Specifically, the fully constrained linear spectral unmixing and object-based classification methods were implemented as the representatives of sub-pixel and super-pixel strategies, respectively. The high spatial resolution Gaofen-2 multispectral imagery collected in September, 2015 was used in this study. The results showed that the overall accuracies of greenspace mapping by the super-pixel method were higher than those by the sub-pixel method in the selected dense urban, sub-urban, and rural subsets. Obviously, the super-pixel method was more advantageous for mapping greenspace from the high spatial resolution imagery, especially for patches of greenspace in rural and mountain areas. When further comparing these two methods using the medium spatial resolution Landsat-8 imagery, we concluded that the sub-pixel method failed to keep the same levels of greenspace mapping accuracies as those using the high spatial resolution Gaofen-2 imagery but outperformed the super-pixel method especially in the dense urban and sub-urban subsets due to their high degrees of greenspace fragmentation. Furthermore, the sub-pixel method also demonstrated its merits in terms of automation and operability compared to the super-pixel method.

Keywords: sub pixel; pixel method; pixel; spatial resolution; greenspace; super pixel

Journal Title: International Journal of Remote Sensing
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.