LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Uterine rupture with placental extrusion during the third stage of labour after an apparently uneventful delivery

Photo by jupp from unsplash

A 39-year-old woman, gravida 4, para 2 was admitted at 34weeks of gestation in threatened preterm labour. She had a voluntary abortion in 2005 with dilatation and curettage, a normal… Click to show full abstract

A 39-year-old woman, gravida 4, para 2 was admitted at 34weeks of gestation in threatened preterm labour. She had a voluntary abortion in 2005 with dilatation and curettage, a normal delivery at term in 2011 and a caesarean section for preterm labour with a breech foetus at 32weeks in 2012. The type of the uterine incision was unknown. Transabdominal ultrasound did not show any abnormality; the placenta was anterograde-fundal and the lower segment thickness was 2.5 cm. Tocolysis and steroid therapy, for lung maturation, were implemented. Nevertheless, 6 days later, after a preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM), the labour started. The patient opted for a vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) and, after 2 h, gave birth to a healthy male. An epidural analgesia was not requested. Neither external intervention nor pharmacological augmentation was performed. The continuous cardiotocography was reassuring throughout the labour. After delivery, uterotonics were administered (synthetic Oxytocin, 5 UI i.v.) as postpartum haemorrhage prophylaxis. The third stage, however, was prolonged. Since the patient felt well, she requested to be submitted to as few as possible interventions; her vital signs were stable, and as the bleeding was minimal it was decided to wait. During this time, a controlled cord traction and moderate fundal pressure were administered intermittently. However, after an hour, the placenta was still retained. Before attempting a manual placental removal, an ultrasound was performed and revealed an empty uterus and placental extrusion thought a dehiscence of the uterine scar (see Figure 1(A)). A pelvic MR confirmed the diagnosis and showed that the placenta was completely detached, excluding a morbid adherence to the uterine wall (see Figure 1(B)). The placenta was removed through a laparotomic access. The uterus was contracted around the rupture. No clinically significant hemoperitoneum was found. The uterine scar dehiscence was sutured in double layers. The woman subsequently developed an infection and sepsis, was treated with antibiotics and this was completely solved at her discharge, 5 days after her delivery. Discussion

Keywords: third stage; delivery; placental extrusion; rupture

Journal Title: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.