Abstract Objectives: To assess the magnitude of difference in all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who died from a cardiovascular disease… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Objectives: To assess the magnitude of difference in all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who died from a cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related cause in the year preceding death vs. those who did not die during this same period. Methods: A large US administrative claims database was used to identify patients with T2DM who died of a CVD-related cause from July 2012 to April 2015. These patients were matched 1:1 to patients with T2DM who did not die, using direct matching methods. HCRU and costs were assessed in each of the four quarters (Q4: 12–10 months; Q3: 9–7 months; Q2: 6–4 months; and Q1: 3–0 months) prior to death and compared between patient cohorts using paired t-tests and McNemar’s tests. Results: A final matched cohort of 7648 patients who died and 7648 patients who did not die were identified. A significantly higher proportion of patients who died utilized inpatient services vs. those who did not die (Q4: 12.6% vs. 4.6%, p < .001; Q3: 14.6% vs. 4.6%, p < .001; Q2: 17.6% vs. 5.5%, p < .001; and Q1: 65.0% vs. 10.1%, p < .001). In addition, patients who died incurred significantly higher all-cause costs (Q4: $8882 vs. $3970, p < .001; Q3: $10,462 vs. $3661, p < .001; Q2: $12,564 vs. $4169, p < .001; and Q1: $36,076 vs. $6319, p < .001). Conclusions: T2DM patients with a CVD-related death had significantly greater HCRU and costs in the year including and preceding death compared to those who did not die.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.