LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Measuring the effectiveness of two-year colleges: a comparison of raw and value-added performance indicators

Photo from wikipedia

ABSTRACT Researchers in higher education frequently evaluate institutional effectiveness as the difference between an actual and predicted graduation rate, but little is known about whether such a method is reliable… Click to show full abstract

ABSTRACT Researchers in higher education frequently evaluate institutional effectiveness as the difference between an actual and predicted graduation rate, but little is known about whether such a method is reliable or valid. This study examines the measurement properties of effectiveness scores derived from regression residuals for community colleges in the United States (n = 875). The test–retest reliability of the resulting effectiveness measure over two consecutive years was acceptable to good (r = .63 to .72). A test of convergent validity indicated that effectiveness scores were positively associated with students’ perceptions of a supportive campus environment (r = .26). A test of discriminant validity revealed relatively small correlations between effectiveness scores and institutional attributes, such as the percent of low-income students (r = −.01). The results support the use of effectiveness scores as a complementary performance indicator for community colleges to better articulate the value added to the student experience.

Keywords: measuring effectiveness; effectiveness scores; performance; value added

Journal Title: Studies in Higher Education
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.