ABSTRACT Since the late 1990s, the development of Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) has evolved to include broader concepts such as water-sensitive cities, offering a complementary alternative to conventional urban… Click to show full abstract
ABSTRACT Since the late 1990s, the development of Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) has evolved to include broader concepts such as water-sensitive cities, offering a complementary alternative to conventional urban water management. While widely accepted in principle, WSUD continues to face critical shortcomings in practice. Through the bibliometric analysis of 688 publications and an in-depth content analysis of the 30 most highly cited articles, this study identifies persistent discrepancies between WSUD’s stated objectives and its real-world outcomes. Key gaps are evident in areas such as long-term performance monitoring, socio-economic impacts, climate resilience, policy integration, and community engagement. The findings also point to recurring social, institutional, technological, and economic limitations that hinder implementation and diffusion. These insights call for a re-evaluation of existing WSUD approaches and underline the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. Future directions in urban planning and design should place greater emphasis on the socio-economic dimensions, climate adaptability, governance structures, and technological innovation necessary to advance WSUD as a core component of sustainable and resilient urban development.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.