LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Partial identification of average treatment effects on the treated through difference-in-differences

Photo by jorgefdezsalas from unsplash

ABSTRACT The difference-in-differences (DID) method is widely used as a tool for identifying causal effects of treatments in program evaluation. When panel data sets are available, it is well-known that… Click to show full abstract

ABSTRACT The difference-in-differences (DID) method is widely used as a tool for identifying causal effects of treatments in program evaluation. When panel data sets are available, it is well-known that the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) is point-identified under the DID setup. If a panel data set is not available, repeated cross sections (pretreatment and posttreatment) may be used, but may not point-identify the ATT. This paper systematically studies the identification of the ATT under the DID setup when posttreatment treatment status is unknown for the pretreatment sample. This is done through a novel application of an extension of a continuous version of the classical monotone rearrangement inequality which allows for general copula bounds. The identifying power of an instrumental variable and of a ‘matched subsample’ is also explored. Finally, we illustrate our approach by estimating the effect of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1991 on employment outcomes of the disabled.

Keywords: difference differences; average treatment; partial identification; treatment; identification average

Journal Title: Econometric Reviews
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.