ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate if there is a difference in the clinical course of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes. Methods Observational multicenter retrospective case series of… Click to show full abstract
ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate if there is a difference in the clinical course of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes. Methods Observational multicenter retrospective case series of patients diagnosed with PVRL between 2007 and 2019, at three tertiary centers. The main outcomes were relapse rates, inflammatory parameters, and best-corrected visual acuities (BCVA). Statistical methods used were an adjusted generalized estimating equation model, and a proportional Cox model. Results Eighty patients (150 eyes) were followed for a median of 1.7 years. At presentation, there were no clinical differences between the groups. The relapse rate was 0.091/eye-year (EY) for vitrectomized eyes and 0.087/EY for non-vitrectomized eyes (p = .35). Vitrectomized eyes had better BCVA than non-vitrectomized eyes (p < .001). Conclusions Vitrectomy had no effect on the relapse rate in eyes with PVRL. However, the decrease in vitreous cell and debris led to vitrectomized eyes having better visual acuity than non-vitrectomized eyes.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.