LAUSR

ABSTRACT A pre-trained neural language model (LM) is usually used to generate texts. Due to exposure bias, the generated text is not as good as real text. Many researchers claimed they employed the Generative Adversarial Nets (GAN) to alleviate this issue by feeding reward signals from a discriminator to update the LM (generator). However, some researchers argued that GAN did not work by evaluating the generated texts with a quality-diversity metric such as Bleu versus self-Bleu, and language model score versus reverse language model score. Unfortunately, these two-dimension metrics are not reliable. Furthermore, the existing methods only assessed the final generated texts, thus neglecting the dynamic evaluating the adversarial learning process. Different from the above-mentioned methods, we adopted the most recent metric functions, which measure the distributional discrepancy between real and generated text. Besides that, we design a comprehensive experiment to investigate the performance during the learning process. First, we evaluate a language model with two functions and identify a large discrepancy. Then, several methods with the detected discrepancy signal to improve the generator were tried. Experimenting with two language GANs on two benchmark datasets, we found that the distributional discrepancy increases with more adversarial learning rounds. Our research provides convicted evidence that the language GANs fail.