LAUSR

PURPOSE To compare the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the commonly used versions of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) (the ADAS-Cog-11 (11 items), ADAS-Cog-3 (three items), ADAS-Cog-5-Subset (five items), ADAS-Cog-6-Subset (six items), and ADAS-Rasch (11 items)) in people with dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS A repeated-assessments design (2 weeks apart) was used to examine the ADAS-Cog-11, ADAS-Cog-3, ADAS-Cog-5-Subset, ADAS-Cog-6-Subset, and ADAS-Rasch. Participants with dementia were recruited from one hospital, one elder care center, and two day-care centers using convenience sampling. RESULTS Fifty-two participants finished the assessments twice in two weeks. All versions showed high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (0.82-0.96), minimal standardized response means (-0.07 to 0.08) and low to acceptable MDC% (9.2-28.6%). The ADAS-Rasch had the highest ICC (0.96) and the lowest MDC%. The ADAS-Cog-3 had an ICC lower than 0.90 (0.82) and the highest MDC% (28.6%). CONCLUSIONS The ADAS-Rasch seems to be the most reliable version of the ADAS-Cog for group- and individual-level comparisons. The ADAS-Cog-3 may be a better choice for researchers for group-level comparisons because it requires fewer items to achieve acceptable reliability. The ADAS-Cog-11, ADAS-Cog-5-Subset, ADAS-Cog-6-Subset, and ADAS-Rasch could be considered for clinical usage for individual-level comparisons.Implications for rehabilitationThe ADAS-Rasch is the most reliable version of the ADAS-Cog for group- and individual-level comparisons due to its excellent test-retest reliability, lowest random measurement error and absence of a practice effect.The ADAS-Cog-5-Subset and ADAS-Cog-6-Subset might be good substitutes for the ADAS-Rasch in clinical settings because of their comparable reliability features and superior administration efficiency.