LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Priest’s Theory of Unity and the Superabundance of Gluons

Photo from academic.microsoft.com

some objects do not exist or have no being: Sosein (so-and-so), so to speak, is independent of Sein (being) (see pp. xxi–ii). Secondly, for Priest, quantification is ontologically noncommittal. So,… Click to show full abstract

some objects do not exist or have no being: Sosein (so-and-so), so to speak, is independent of Sein (being) (see pp. xxi–ii). Secondly, for Priest, quantification is ontologically noncommittal. So, instead of an existential quantifier and its dual, Priest uses a particular quantifier and its dual (see xxi–ii). 12. Or is that so? PEM might break down at a quantum micro-level even in the orthodox view. For simplicity, let us set this complication aside. 13. See Priest 2008, Ch. 8, Sect. 4, p. 146. 14. See Priest 1987, Sect. 4.7; Priest 2006, Ch. 19, Sect. 6. For a criticism of Priest’s earlier argument for PEM, see Parsons 1990.

Keywords: unity superabundance; theory unity; priest theory; see; priest; superabundance gluons

Journal Title: International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.