LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Letter to the editor regarding the review article by Yamada et al. (2021) titled “Critical evaluation of the human relevance of the mode of action for rodent liver tumor formation by activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR)”

Photo by artlasovsky from unsplash

comprehensive review article by Yamada et al. (2021) on a topic that is a matter of scientific debate for quite some years now: the human relevance of the mode of… Click to show full abstract

comprehensive review article by Yamada et al. (2021) on a topic that is a matter of scientific debate for quite some years now: the human relevance of the mode of action (MoA) for liver tumor formation by chemicals that are activators of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR). Following a critical analysis of currently available data concerning this topic the authors conclude that this MoA is qualitatively not plausible for humans. Their conclusion is based on a pivotal species difference in hepatocellular proliferation (a key event in CAR-mediated rodent liver tumor formation), supported by negative epidemiology data for the archetypical CAR activator phenobarbital (PB). According to the authors

Keywords: car; liver tumor; tumor formation

Journal Title: Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.