ABSTRACT Informed by scholarship on gendered leadership, feminist institutionalism, and policy failures, the article asks whether hypermasculine leadership traits – displayed in rhetoric, behavior, and symbols – contributed to a… Click to show full abstract
ABSTRACT Informed by scholarship on gendered leadership, feminist institutionalism, and policy failures, the article asks whether hypermasculine leadership traits – displayed in rhetoric, behavior, and symbols – contributed to a failure in the timely implementation of appropriate policy measures and the clear and effective communication of new rules to citizens to gain their trust and widespread compliance, with an important impact on the effectiveness of early Covid policy responses. From this preliminary study, it appears that the reluctance of hypermasculine leaders to take the pandemic seriously and implement or adhere to mitigation measures, contributed to incoherent policy-making, poor and confused communication, reducing levels of public trust, and contributing to high rates of infection and death. The article also highlights hypermasculine leadership styles’ contextual specificity, by exploring in greater depth how UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s particular form of English elite white hypermasculinity influenced his policy responses and communication strategies.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.