LAUSR

ABSTRACT Interprofessional education (IPE) using simulations provides a rich environment for mastery learning and deliberate practice. The debriefing phase is identified as the most valuable by learners, yet investigation into the most effective format for debriefing interprofessional (IP) groups has largely gone unexplored. To determine the best practices in IP simulation debriefing, we compared perceived effectiveness of in-person versus teledebriefing, and single versus IP co-debriefer models according to 404 Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare Student-Version (DASH-SV) scores from students in medicine, nursing, and respiratory therapy (n = 135) following three critical care simulations. All calculated total mean scores were in the acceptable range (above 4.0), indicating a positive experience for all methods. We found statistically significantly higher scores for in-person (M = 5.79) compared to teledebriefing (M = 4.96, p < .001). Single debriefer (M = 6.09) compared to IP co-debriefer DASH scores (M = 5.93) for all scenarios were not significantly different (p = .059). Our results suggest that teledebriefing may provide a solution for simulation programs with off-site or rural learners, and that a single in-person debriefing can be equally effective as co-debriefing for IP students.