LAUSR

ABSTRACT Interprofessional undergraduate/pre-registration simulations (UIPSims) are growing in popularity but remain under researched and without pedagogic instruction. We report on an evaluation of final year healthcare student UIPSims, focussed on safe practice using a mixed methods study. The evaluation combines traditional methods with direct observations of students. Students completed a pre and post-course questionnaire with scored and free text questions and in addition an ethnographer observed the UIPSims supported with video recordings. Final year students participated (medical, nursing, operating department practitioner, pharmacy; n = 230). The scored questions were significant (p < .01) with student comments confirming the value of the learning. The observations identified strengths and weaknesses. The students were professional and patient-centered, but were unable to function as a team, communicate effectively for shared decision making or recognize and highlight patient safety concerns. The facilitators mainly guided rather than facilitated proceedings. Despite having completed a theme of interprofessional education (IPE) designed to develop team working abilities, final year healthcare students were unable to function as a student team in order to apply theory to practice. The findings highlight how an interprofessional simulation at the end of an undergraduate curriculum offers a litmus test on student readiness for teamworking. The findings support an IPE curriculum with a set of theoretical principles aligned to a set of team working skills in readiness for participating in an UIPSims. In addition, facilitators should be trained on the principles for IPE as well as on best practice for simulations. Briefing is vital, enabling students to come together to form a team and find their collective voice. Observational research offers a powerful evaluation tool illuminating what is happening in these teaching situations. More research on the constituent components of UIPSims is required.