LAUSR

ABSTRACT Selection of optimal paths or sequences of cells from a grid of cells is one of the most basic functions of raster-based geographic information systems. For this function to work, it is often assumed that the optimality of a path can be evaluated by the sum of the weighted lengths of all its segments – weighted, i.e. by the underlying cell values. The validity of this assumption must be questioned, however, if those values are measured on a scale that does not permit arithmetic operations. Through computational experiments with randomly generated artificial landscapes, this paper compares two models, minisum and minimax path models, which aggregate the values of the cells associated with a path using the sum function and the maximum function, respectively. Results suggest that the minisum path model is effective if the path search can be translated into the conventional least-cost path problem, which aims to find a path with the minimum cost-weighted length between two terminuses on a ratio-scaled raster cost surface. On the other hand, the minimax path model is found mathematically sounder if the cost values are measured on an ordinal scale and practically useful if the problem is concerned not with the minimization of cost but with the maximization of some desirable condition such as suitability.