LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Patient and physician preferences for treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in Japan: a discrete choice experiment.

Abstract Aims This study was performed to evaluate patients’ and physicians’ preferences regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in Japan, particularly focusing on direct-acting antivirals. Understanding these preferences is important… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Aims This study was performed to evaluate patients’ and physicians’ preferences regarding hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in Japan, particularly focusing on direct-acting antivirals. Understanding these preferences is important for maintaining adherence to treatment necessary for achieving HCV elimination. Methods A discrete choice experiment was conducted to identify patients’ and physicians’ preferences for HCV treatment in Japan. Eligible participants completed a preference survey via an online questionnaire. Eight attributes and their respective levels – pertaining to dosing regimen/schedule, safety, and out-of-pocket costs – were identified. The primary and secondary endpoints were the relative attribute importance (RAI) and utility value of attribute levels, which were compared between patients and physicians to highlight differences. Results Both patients (n = 95) and physicians (n = 118) showed the greatest concern for total out-of-pocket treatment costs, followed by safety risks. While patients and physicians generally shared similar treatment preferences, patients placed a higher RAI on total out-of-pocket costs than did physicians (50.4% vs. 39.4%). Conversely, patients assigned lower RAI values to the risks of nasopharyngitis and pruritus (15.2% vs. 17.9% and 11.7% vs. 16.2%, respectively). The RAI for the number of tablets taken daily was higher than that for treatment duration among patients (11.6% vs. 0.2%), but nearly equal among physicians. Limitations The study had potential non-response bias, physicians not being actual care providers for surveyed patients, a small sample size, reliance on predefined DCE attributes, and limited participant diversity from online panels. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of patient-centered care in HCV treatment and the need to raise awareness of the public subsidy for hepatitis, and to ensure an effective access scheme for the patients. Simplifying regimens like once-daily pills and minimal monitoring may enhance treatment convenience. Improved patient–physician communication supports optimized strategies, aiding Japan’s goal of HCV elimination by 2030.

Keywords: treatment; hepatitis virus; patients physicians; discrete choice; japan

Journal Title: Journal of medical economics
Year Published: 2025

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.