LAUSR

ABSTRACT In the literature, a distinction is made between low-level concerns and what is regarded as fitness to practise concerns. The General Medical Council expects all UK medical schools to have a transparent process in place about how concerns about its medical students are identified monitored and responded to. However, internationally, there is currently no well-established consensus on what is good practice in managing low-level concerns. Furthermore, currently, there is little information on how the UK medical schools vary in the processes they implement to monitor and respond to low-level concerns of their students. An online survey was developed and informed by the literature and sent to all UK medical schools to better understand their low-level concerns process. Of 39 medical schools invited, 25 participated. The data indicate variations between medical schools in the processes implemented. These variations can potentially influence the quality of the data; for example, whether there is a named person co-ordinating concerns between medical schools and placement providers. Furthermore, the data identify primary-care-based learning as offering missed opportunities where low-level concerns could be picked up. Key areas identified within the data for further work include how to quality assure that processes are equitable and how to bring more consistency to what sanctions are common and how these are decided up on.