LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Respiratory protective device: one size to fit them all?

Photo from wikipedia

When exposed to hazardous or toxic substances, workers may be required to wear respiratory protective devices, selected in accordance with the pollutant, required protection level, individual characteristics and work conditions.… Click to show full abstract

When exposed to hazardous or toxic substances, workers may be required to wear respiratory protective devices, selected in accordance with the pollutant, required protection level, individual characteristics and work conditions. In order to emphasize the importance of the selection procedure, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the facial dimensions and breathing rate on the fit and the protection efficiency provided by full face respirators. Manikin total efficiency measurements (mTEs) were then conducted on five head forms of various facial dimensions equipped with nine respirators of different models and sizes. A breathing machine simulating sinusoidal breathing rates was used to represent seven work rates, from rest to maximal intensity. For each experiment, the manikin fit factor (mFF), characterizing the respirator fit on the head form, was measured by a controlled negative pressure method. By varying the head form, respirator, breathing rate, and mFF, a total of 485 values of mTE were measured. Findings indicate that even if the respirator was equipped with a high efficiency filter, mTE strongly decreases if the respirator does not fit the face of the wearer. In particular, it was highlighted that one given respirator cannot fit all facial dimensions, and that the best match between the respirator size and facial dimensions is difficult to predict due to the fact that respirator sizes are not standardized. Moreover, although the total efficiency of a well-fitted respirator naturally decreases when increasing the breathing rate due to filtration mechanisms, the reduction is more significant if the respirator does not fit well. In order to consider both the mTE and the breathing resistance, a quality factor value was determined for each tested combination of head form, respirator and breathing rate. The maximum manikin fit factor mFFmax measured for each combination of head form and respirator was compared to that measured on nine human subjects with similar facial dimensions, providing encouraging results concerning the use of head forms during respirator testing.

Keywords: head; respiratory protective; breathing rate; facial dimensions; respirator fit; respirator

Journal Title: Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.