LAUSR

1–13. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0301-7. NIH. 2019. The BRAIN initiativeVR and neuroethics: Enabling and enhancing neuroscience advances for society. Accessed July 23. https://braininitiative.nih.gov/strategic-planning/acd-working-groups/brain-initiative%C2% AE-and-neuroethics-enabling-and-enhancing. Pe~ na-Guzm an, D. M., and J. Locke. 2021. De-centering the “west” in cross-cultural philosophy: Philosophical pedagogy in the emory-Tibet science initiative. Frontiers in Communication 6:727760. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021. 727760. Specker Sullivan, L. 2021. Empowering skepticism: Neuroethics engagement with Tibetan Buddhist monastics. Frontiers in Communication 6:777803. doi:10.3389/ fcomm.2021.777803. Specker Sullivan, L. 2022. Mistaken compassion: Tibetan Buddhist perspectives on neuroethics. AJOB Neuroscience 13 (4):245–256. doi:10.1080/21507740.2021.1939460. Tsomo, K. L. 2012. Compassion, ethics, and neuroscience: Neuroethics through Buddhist eyes. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):529–37. doi:10.1007/s11948-0129369-4. van Vugt, M. K., J. Pollock, B. Johnson, K. Gyatso, N. Norbu, T. Lodroe, T. Gyaltsen, L. Phuntsok, J. Thakchoe, J. Khechok, et al. 2020. Inter-brain synchronization in the practice of Tibetan monastic debate. Mindfulness 11 (5): 1105–19. doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01338-1. Zhou, V. X. 2022. Engaging non-essentialism as lived wisdom: A dialogue between intercultural communication and Buddhism. Language and Intercultural Communication 22 (3):294–311. doi:10.1080/14708477. 2022.2046768.