Objective. The present study evaluates the influence of different thorax contours (generic versus individual) on the parameter ‘silent spaces’ computed from electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurements. Approach. Six patients with… Click to show full abstract
Objective. The present study evaluates the influence of different thorax contours (generic versus individual) on the parameter ‘silent spaces’ computed from electrical impedance tomography (EIT) measurements. Approach. Six patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were analyzed retrospectively. EIT measurements were performed and the silent spaces were calculated based on (1) patient-specific contours Sind, (2) generic adult male contours SEidorsA and (3) generic neonate contours SEidorsN. Main results. The differences among all studied subjects were 5 ± 6% and 8 ± 7% for Sind versus SEidorsA, Sind versus SEidorsN, respectively (median ± interquartile range). Sind values were higher than the generic ones in two patients. Significance. In the present study, we demonstrated the differences in values when the silent spaces were calculated based on different body and organ contours. To our knowledge, this study was the first one showing explicitly that silent spaces calculated with generic thorax and lung contours might lead to results with different locations and values as compared to the calculation with subject-specific models. Interpretations of silent spaces should be proceeded with caution.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.