LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Longitudinal Association between Weight Status, Aerobic Capacity, Muscular Strength, and Endurance among New York City Youth, 2010-2017.

Photo from wikipedia

Background: Child weight status is inversely associated with fitness, but less is known about this relationship across fitness domains. This study examined the longitudinal association between weight status and fitness… Click to show full abstract

Background: Child weight status is inversely associated with fitness, but less is known about this relationship across fitness domains. This study examined the longitudinal association between weight status and fitness domains in a large, diverse sample of children. Methods: Data were drawn from the New York City Fitnessgram (2010-2011 to 2017-2018). Height and weight were collected annually and converted to weight status using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts. Aerobic capacity, muscular strength, and endurance were measured as age and sex standardized z-scores based on the fitness performance tests. Repeated-measures multilevel models were run testing the association between weight status and 1-year lagged fitness domains. Results: The sample included 917,554 children (51.8% male, 39.3% Hispanic, 29.9% non-Hispanic Black, 13.9%, 4.7%, and 1.7% class I, II, and III obesity, respectively). For each fitness domain, fitness scores decreased with increasing weight status across all demographic categories, with the lowest fitness scores observed in children with the most severe obesity, and highest magnitude of effects for aerobic capacity, and particularly among boys, non-Hispanic Whites, and older youth. For example, compared with youth with healthy weight, youth with overweight had 0.28 standard deviation lower aerobic capacity performance [confidence interval (95% CI): -0.29 to -0.28], followed by class 1 obesity (β = -0.57, 95% CI: -0.58 to -0.57), class 2 obesity (β = -0.88, 95% CI: -0.88 to -0.88), and class 3 obesity (β = -1.19, 95% CI: -1.20 to -1.18). Conclusions: Compared with youth with healthy weight, youth at every other weight status had lower subsequent fitness, with the magnitude of the relationship increasing as weight status increased. Future research should examine interventions targeting aerobic capacity to reduce fitness disparities.

Keywords: aerobic capacity; fitness; weight status; status

Journal Title: Childhood obesity
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.