LAUSR

Objective To evaluate and compare the ability of the Guy's stone score (GSS), the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry, and the Clinical Research Office of the Endourology Society (CROES) nomogram to predict the outcome of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPNL) in children, and to identify which of the predictors involved in these scoring systems can separately affect this outcome. Patients and methods All children below 14 years who had MPNL in our center over a period of three years were included prospectively. Bivariate analyses were done to evaluate the associations of the three scoring systems and the predictors composing them with single-session stone clearance and complications. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analyses of the three scoring systems were conducted to evaluate and compare their abilities to predict the outcomes. Decision curve analyses for the three scoring systems were conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of using each of them to predict stone clearance. Results We consecutively enrolled 92 renal units in 89 children with a median age of 9.5 years. Single-session stone clearance was achieved in 76 (82.6%) renal units. Complications occurred with 19 (20.7%) procedures. Stone multiplicity (p=0.043), staghorn stone (p=0.007), prior stone treatment (p<0.001), number of calyces involved (p=0.006), stone burden (p=0.003), GSS (p<0.001), S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry (p=0.012), and CROES nomogram (p<0.001) had significant associations with stone clearance. Only stone attenuation was significantly associated with complications (p=0.031). For prediction of stone clearance, CROES nomogram demonstrated the greatest area under the ROC curve and the greatest net benefit on decision curve analyses. Conclusions For children undergoing MPNL, CROES nomogram is the best to predict stone clearance. However, none of the studied scoring systems predicted complications efficiently.