LAUSR

Purpose We attempt to understand the relationship between surgeon technical skills, cognitive workload and errors during a simulated robotic dissection task. Materials and Methods Participant surgeons performed a robotic surgery dissection exercise. Participants were grouped based on surgical experience. Technical skills were evaluated utilizing the validated Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) assessment tool. The dissection task was evaluated for errors during active dissection or passive retraction maneuvers. We quantified cognitive workload of surgeon participants as an Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA), derived from Task-Evoked-Pupillary-Response metrics; ICA ranged 0-1, with 1 representing maximum ICA. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used for all modellings to establish relationships between surgeon technical skills, cognitive workload and errors. Results We found a strong association between technical skills as measured by multiple GEARS domains (depth perception, force sensitivity and robotic control) and passive errors, with higher GEARS scores associated with a lower relative risk of errors (all p < 0.01). For novice surgeons, as average GEARS scores increased, the average estimated ICA decreased. In contrast, as average GEARS increased for expert surgeons, the average estimated ICA increased. When exhibiting optimal technical skill (maximal GEARS scores) novices and experts reached a similar range of ICA scores (ICA 0.47 and 0.42, respectively). Conclusions This study found that there is an optimal cognitive workload level for surgeons of all experience levels during our robotic surgical exercise. Select technical skill domains were strong predictors of errors. Future research will explore whether an ideal cognitive workload range truly optimizes surgical training and reduce surgical errors.