LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Development of an automated composite ureteroscopic efficiency score (CUES) through simulated ureteroscopic skills assessment.

Photo by jontyson from unsplash

INTRODUCTION Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is the most common procedure for treatment of urolithiasis. We previously utilized kinematic evaluations of simulated fURS to demonstrate certain body movements are associated with efficient… Click to show full abstract

INTRODUCTION Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is the most common procedure for treatment of urolithiasis. We previously utilized kinematic evaluations of simulated fURS to demonstrate certain body movements are associated with efficient ureteroscopic manipulation for complex tasks. Herein, we incorporated computer vision to create an efficiency score using ureteroscope travel distance (DIST), task time (TIME), spectral arc length (SPARC), and percentage of purposeful wall collisions (COLL). The goal is a simulation-based system that can abstract these automated performance metrics (APMs) to differentiate between novice and expert ureteroscopic handling. METHODS A ureteroscopic simulation box was used. Body kinematics, task time, and ureteroscopic movements were analyzed using a motion capture system and video camera. Optical flow computer vision was used to track the ureteroscope. DIST, TIME, and SPARC were automatically calculated. Wall collisions were automatically captured and independently judged by two authors; an algorithm was developed to automatically determine the COLL variable. A mixed effects model was used to aggregate these variables and distinguish between surgeons' first and final task attempts. The normalized values of these metrics were added to create a Composite Ureteroscopy Efficiency Score (CUES). RESULTS 12 urologists completed the simulated tasks. The COLL assessment algorithm determined beneficial wall collisions with an accuracy of 77%. Normalized values of TIME, DIST, SPARC, and COLL were combined to create a composite ureteroscopic efficiency score (CUES). Compared to the first attempt, both the second and third attempts had statistically significant improvements in CUES. The ROC-AUC score reached 0.86, suggesting excellent discrimination between attempts. There was also a statistically significant difference in CUES when comparing resident and attending performance. CONCLUSIONS Automated performance metrics can be abstracted using computer vision and artificial intelligence; an aggregate composite score (CUES) may be a promising method for evaluation of ureteroscopic efficiency. FUNDING Endoscopic equipment provided by Boston Scientific.

Keywords: time; ureteroscopic efficiency; efficiency score; score; efficiency; score cues

Journal Title: Journal of endourology
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.