LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

A Multi-Institutional Matched-Pair Analysis of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Single versus Multiple Ipsilateral Renal Masses.

Photo by dawson2406 from unsplash

INTRODUCTION Nephron-sparing surgery is important in patients with multiple renal tumors, especially if associated with a solitary kidney or hereditary syndrome. Prior studies have shown partial nephrectomy of multiple, ipsilateral… Click to show full abstract

INTRODUCTION Nephron-sparing surgery is important in patients with multiple renal tumors, especially if associated with a solitary kidney or hereditary syndrome. Prior studies have shown partial nephrectomy of multiple, ipsilateral renal masses to have good oncologic and renal function outcomes. We aim to compare renal function changes, complications, and warm ischemia time (WIT) of robotic partial nephrectomies of a single mass (sPN) versus multifocal, ipsilateral masses (mPN). MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed our multi-institutional partial nephrectomy database. We matched robotic sPN and mPN patients approximately 3:1 using "nearest neighbor" propensity score matching based on age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), total tumor size, and nephrometry score. Univariate analysis was performed, and multivariable models were fit controlling for age, sex, CCI, and tumor size. RESULTS Fifty mPN and 146 sPN patients were matched. The mean total tumor size was 3.3 and 3.2 cm, respectively (p=0.363). The mean nephrometry score in both groups was 7.3 and 7.2, respectively (p=0.772). Estimated blood loss (EBL) was 137.6 and 117.8 mL, respectively (p=0.184). The mPN group had higher operative time (174.6 vs. 156.4 minutes, p=0.008) and WIT (17.0 vs. 15.3 minutes, p=0.032). There was no significant difference in the change in glomerular filtration rate (mPN -6.4% vs. sPN -8.7%, p=0.712). Complications (Clavien 2+) occurred in 10.2% of mPN and 11.3% of sPN patients (p=0.837). A multivariable linear model predicts a non-statistically significant difference of 1.4 minutes of additional WIT in the mPN group (p=0.242). There was no statistical difference in complication rates between groups in a multivariable model (OR 1.00, p=0.991). CONCLUSIONS Robotic partial nephrectomy in our multi-institutional matched comparison of mPN and sPN showed no difference in complications, renal functional outcomes, or EBL. mPN was associated with increased operative time and WIT, though the WIT difference was not significant on multivariable analysis.

Keywords: multi institutional; spn; analysis; partial nephrectomy; difference; robotic partial

Journal Title: Journal of endourology
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.