BACKGROUND Advance directives (ADs) and Physicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) orders perform different but complementary functions in documenting a patient's treatment preferences and translating them into actionable orders that… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND Advance directives (ADs) and Physicians Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) orders perform different but complementary functions in documenting a patient's treatment preferences and translating them into actionable orders that change in keeping with the patient's evolving clinical picture. Maryland's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form developed through a stakeholder-driven process that deviates from other POLST forms. While a patient or surrogate can decline discussing MOLST orders with a clinician, clinicians must write MOLST orders for certain patients (e.g., those admitted to a nursing home (NH), assisted living facility (ALF), hospice, home health (HH) agency, or dialysis center, discharged from a hospital to any of these facilities, or transferred between hospitals). OBJECTIVE To gather data on Maryland MOLST form use to evaluate performance and inform future research and practice. DESIGN Chart reviews (CRs). SETTING/SUBJECTS MOLST forms and patient data collected from Maryland hospitals (adult nonpsych, nontrauma, nonobstetric patients), NHs, ALFs, hospices, HH agencies, and dialysis centers. MEASUREMENTS Facility demographic tool and CR tools. RESULTS A total of 1959 CRs were received from 137 facilities, including 2064 MOLST forms. Most patients required to have MOLST orders had them (84%); fewer had ADs (47%). Few patients or surrogates declined discussing MOLST orders (1%). Few MOLST orders were written based on medical ineffectiveness criteria defined in Maryland law (<1%). MOLST form completion error rates ranged from 1% to 3%. Non-white patients were about twice as likely to have a MOLST "Attempt CPR" order (62%) as white patients (32%). CONCLUSIONS MOLST error rates are relatively low and consistent with other research. Areas for improvement include selecting one order option where required, avoiding contradictions between Page 1 and 2 orders, offering MOLST Page 2 options if relevant, and documenting in the medical record a summary of the discussion informing MOLST orders.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.