LAUSR

Purpose: To survey current intensive care unit (ICU) practice in initiating antifungal therapy for prophylaxis and treatment of suspected candidiasis after abdominal surgery. The goal was to establish the need to prioritize research toward standardized care of such patients. Methods: Online questionnaire survey of clinical practice based on theoretical case scenarios. These were structured with expert input to investigate management of: hemodynamically stable/unstable patient after urgent upper/lower gastrointestinal surgery with/without fungal growth in culture. The link to the survey was sent to all active members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Results: The survey was completed by 101 respondents from 29 countries. Fewer than half (48.5%) stated that in their center, ICU antibiotic and antifungal therapy is managed by a dedicated specialist physician/team that manages all ICU patients. Respondents exhibited a greater tendency toward administering antifungal agents, mainly fluconazole, to hemodynamically unstable patients. One week after surgery for a perforated duodenal ulcer, only half responded they would use antifungal agents when a patient develops septic shock. Most respondents chose to administer antifungal therapy in patients with septic shock if Candida had been identified in any culture. The source of infection, location of surgery, or type of Candida were not viewed as triggers for therapeutic decisions. Conclusion: The current survey demonstrates large variability in antifungal use. Decisions are made irrespective of existing guidelines and seem to be driven by patient hemodynamic condition and identification of any Candida in any culture alone.