LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Analyticity up to the boundary for the Stokes and the Navier-Stokes systems

Photo from wikipedia

For simplicity we assume d 2 {2, 3}; higher dimensions can be treated in the same way. The main goal of this paper is to establish the immediate gain of… Click to show full abstract

For simplicity we assume d 2 {2, 3}; higher dimensions can be treated in the same way. The main goal of this paper is to establish the immediate gain of space-time analyticity for solutions to (1.1)–(1.2), using a direct energy-type method, in the case of a domain with curved boundary. Our main result is Theorem 2.8 below, which shows that from a Sobolev smooth initial datum the solution instantaneously becomes space-time analytic, with analyticity radius which is uniform up to the curved analytic boundary. The direct energy-type approach utilized in this paper was presented in [33] for the Stokes system and in [12] for the Navier-Stokes equations on the half space. This method is robust and easily expendable to the case of non-analytic Gevrey-classes, jointly in space-time, provided the boundary belongs to the same Gevrey class. Analyticity and Gevrey-class regularity have proven to be important for studying the vanishing viscosity problem for the Navier-Stokes equations in bounded domains [45, 46, 37, 30, 14, 50, 41, 19], and for establishing nonlinear inviscid damping near the Couette flow [3, 4, 5]. Moreover, the analyticity radius provides a measure of the minimal scale in a turbulent flow [24]. Analyticity and Gevrey-class regularity for the Navier-Stokes equation is a classical subject [13, 49]. Initially, interior analyticity for the Navier-Stokes system in d 2 space dimensions was proven by Kahane [25], using an iteration of high order Sobolev norms. The problem of interior space-time analyticity was then addressed by Masuda [39], and then by Kato-Masuda [26], assuming that the external force is analytic. Analyticity up to the boundary of the domain was established by Komatsu in [28, 29], based on earlier work by Kinderlehrer and Nirenberg [27] for parabolic type equations. Subsequently, Giga [20] developed a semigroup approach for analyticity up to the boundary for the Navier-Stokes system. On the other hand, in the absence of boundaries, Foias and Temam [18] introduced an alternative approach to analyticity and Gevrey-class regularity which is based on L2 energy estimates and Fourier analysis (cf. [17, 13] for an earlier energy approach for the time analyticity). This method has proven to be a powerful tool to establish analyticity as well as to estimate the analyticity or the Gevrey radius. The

Keywords: analyticity; analyticity boundary; space time; navier stokes

Journal Title: Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.