LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

To make long-term gains against infection inequity, infectious disease epidemiology needs to develop a more sociological imagination.

Photo from wikipedia

In their article in this issue of AJE, Kubale et al. (Am J Epidemiol. XXXX;XXX(XX):XXXX-XXXX) articulate in detail the mechanisms connecting high-level 'fundamental social causes' of health inequity to inequitable… Click to show full abstract

In their article in this issue of AJE, Kubale et al. (Am J Epidemiol. XXXX;XXX(XX):XXXX-XXXX) articulate in detail the mechanisms connecting high-level 'fundamental social causes' of health inequity to inequitable infectious disease outcomes including infection, severe disease, and death. In this response, we argue that while intensive focus on intervening mechanisms is welcome and necessary, it cannot occur in isolation from examination of the way that fundamental social causes - including racism, socioeconomic inequity, and social stigma -sustain infection inequities even when intervening mechanisms are addressed. We build on the taxonomy of intervening mechanisms laid out by Kubale et al. to create a roadmap for strengthening the connection between fundamental cause theory and infectious disease epidemiology and discuss its implications for future research and intervention.

Keywords: inequity; disease epidemiology; disease; intervening mechanisms; infectious disease; epidemiology

Journal Title: American journal of epidemiology
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.