Abstract Background Targeted and checkpoint inhibitor therapies for advanced melanoma have led to major improvements in overall survival (OS). Using long-term evidence, the objective was to estimate the relative efficacy… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Background Targeted and checkpoint inhibitor therapies for advanced melanoma have led to major improvements in overall survival (OS). Using long-term evidence, the objective was to estimate the relative efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) vs. relevant comparators among treatment-naive patients with advanced, unresectable stage III/IV melanoma. Methods A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of first-line advanced melanoma therapies was conducted in November 2018. Key comparators were immunotherapies (NIVO+IPI; NIVO; pembrolizumab [PEM]), and BRAF+MEK inhibitors (dabrafenib + trametinib [DAB+TRAM]; encorafenib + binimetinib [ENC+BIN]; vemurafenib + cobimetinib [VEM+COB]). Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) models were used to estimate comparative OS. The NMAs used models of constant (overall) hazard ratio (HR) over time, and fractional polynomials to estimate time-varying HR, along with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Subgroup analyses and alternate models were explored to evaluate effect modification of immunotherapies by BRAF-mutation status. Results In total, 12 RCTs formed the network of evidence for OS (maximum follow-up: 30 to 60 months). For NIVO+IPI vs. each BRAF+MEK inhibitor, the HR decreased steadily over time. The hazard of death was similar by 6 months and lower at 12 months; thereafter, NIVO+IPI was associated with a significantly reduced hazard of death. At 18 months, HRs for NIVO+IPI vs. each BRAF+MEK inhibitor ranged from 0.45 to 0.52; by 42 months (longest duration of observed data for BRAF+MEK inhibitors), HRs were 0.24 to 0.29 (all CrIs Conclusions NIVO+IPI confers similar or sustained improvements in long-term OS compared with immunotherapies and BRAF+MEK inhibitors. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb. Disclosure P. Mohr: Honoraria (self), To manually add email to ESMO: To manually add email to ESMO. K. Toor: Full / Part-time employment, KT is an employee of Precision Xtract. Precision Xtract received funding for this project from Bristol-Myers Squibb: Precision Xtract. S. Goring: Advisory / Consultancy, SG acted as a consultant to Precision Xtract. Precision Xtract received funding for this project from Bristol-Myers Squibb: Precision Xtract. K. Chan: Full / Part-time employment, KC is an employee of Precision Xtract. Precision Xtract received funding for this project from Bristol-Myers Squibb: Precision Xtract. M. Besada: Full / Part-time employment, MB is an employee of Precision Xtract. Precision Xtract received funding for this project from Bristol-Myers Squibb: Precision Xtract. H.M. Johnson: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb. A. Moshyk: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. S. Kotapati: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.