LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

BEESEM: estimation of binding energy models using HT‐SELEX data

Photo by bermixstudio from unsplash

Motivation: Characterizing the binding specificities of transcription factors (TFs) is crucial to the study of gene expression regulation. Recently developed high‐throughput experimental methods, including protein binding microarrays (PBM) and high‐throughput… Click to show full abstract

Motivation: Characterizing the binding specificities of transcription factors (TFs) is crucial to the study of gene expression regulation. Recently developed high‐throughput experimental methods, including protein binding microarrays (PBM) and high‐throughput SELEX (HT‐SELEX), have enabled rapid measurements of the specificities for hundreds of TFs. However, few studies have developed efficient algorithms for estimating binding motifs based on HT‐SELEX data. Also the simple method of constructing a position weight matrix (PWM) by comparing the frequency of the preferred sequence with single‐nucleotide variants has the risk of generating motifs with higher information content than the true binding specificity. Results: We developed an algorithm called BEESEM that builds on a comprehensive biophysical model of protein‐DNA interactions, which is trained using the expectation maximization method. BEESEM is capable of selecting the optimal motif length and calculating the confidence intervals of estimated parameters. By comparing BEESEM with the published motifs estimated using the same HT‐SELEX data, we demonstrate that BEESEM provides significant improvements. We also evaluate several motif discovery algorithms on independent PBM and ChIP‐seq data. BEESEM provides significantly better fits to in vitro data, but its performance is similar to some other methods on in vivo data under the criterion of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). This highlights the limitations of the purely rank‐based AUROC criterion. Using quantitative binding data to assess models, however, demonstrates that BEESEM improves on prior models. Availability and Implementation: Freely available on the web at http://stormo.wustl.edu/resources.html. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Keywords: beesem estimation; using selex; data beesem; beesem; estimation binding; selex data

Journal Title: Bioinformatics
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.