LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Waist circumference is better than body mass index, but sagittal anterior diameter may be even better.

Photo from wikipedia

Editor—Waist circumference is at least as good an indicator of total body fat as BMI or skin fold thicknesses. It does not, however, distinguish visceral from subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue.… Click to show full abstract

Editor—Waist circumference is at least as good an indicator of total body fat as BMI or skin fold thicknesses. It does not, however, distinguish visceral from subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue. An alternative anthropometric measure that could be used is the sagittal abdominal diameter, which has shown a strong correlation with abdominal fat, cardiovascular risk, sudden death, and overall mortality. Sagittal abdominal diameter showed the strongest correlation with visceral abdominal adipose tissue in both normal/overweight and obese groups within both sexes. In addition, waist circumference was more highly correlated with subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue than with visceral abdominal adipose tissue in all the subgroups.

Keywords: waist circumference; circumference; adipose tissue; abdominal adipose; diameter; body

Journal Title: British journal of anaesthesia
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.