Extra-Anatomical Detour Stents offer a viable modality of decompression particularly in the context of malignancies; with the absent need for changes of stents, cosmetically better than nephrostomies and fewer admissions… Click to show full abstract
Extra-Anatomical Detour Stents offer a viable modality of decompression particularly in the context of malignancies; with the absent need for changes of stents, cosmetically better than nephrostomies and fewer admissions associated with blockages/infections. Our aim was to assess the safety and feasibility of performing detour stents in a district general hospital. A review of prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing detour stents between 2016 and 2021 was undertaken. This enabled a possible follow up period of 6 months, provided the patients remained alive. A statistical package was utilised for the analysis of the collected data. Fifty patients were identified to have undergone detour stent insertion with malignancy being the indication in 90% of cases. Seven patients required a further eleven procedures with the most common being due to repositioning of the stent (36%) or change of stent due to infection (27%). Four patients passed away within 60 days of their procedure. Four patients had their stents eventually replaced with nephrostomies and a patient no longer required the detour stent due to resolution of their obstructive pathology. Nine patients are currently being followed up and thirty-six patients from the original cohort passed away with functional detour stents. Their median survival time post-procedure was 164 days. Extra-Anatomical Detour Stents offers patients with obstructing renal tract secondary to malignancy a better quality of life when compared with nephrostomy. Continued caseload and refinement of surgical technique would lead to further optimised surgical outcomes.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.