LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Meta-analysis Comparing Bifidobacteria Abundance in Infants Fed Standard or Prebiotic-supplemented Formulas and Exclusively Breastfed (OR01-07-19).

Photo from wikipedia

Objectives Infant formulas typically lack prebiotic human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) that promote the growth of beneficial gut flora. Supplementation of infant formulas with a variety of non-HMO prebiotics has attempted… Click to show full abstract

Objectives Infant formulas typically lack prebiotic human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) that promote the growth of beneficial gut flora. Supplementation of infant formulas with a variety of non-HMO prebiotics has attempted to replicate this effect, but study sizes have been small and results have been inconclusive. This meta-analysis summarized the results of the published studies of Bifidobacteria abundance in infants fed standard and non-HMO prebiotic-supplemented formulas compared to that of exclusively breastfed infants. Methods A literature search was conducted of PubMed and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials of Bifidobacteria abundance in healthy, term, pre-weaning human infants given a non-HMO prebiotic-supplemented infant formula (PF) or a control formula (CF) compared to an exclusively breastfed (EBF) reference group. The prebiotics tested were fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS), galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS), polydextrose (PDX), and inulin; CF were identical to corresponding PF excepting the addition of prebiotics. Results were pooled and post-intervention standardized mean difference in Bifidobacteria absolute abundance was calculated for CF and PF groups compared to an EBF reference group and to each group's own baseline value. Network meta-analysis summarized the data for each group. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results Nine studies representing 12 test formulas met inclusion criteria. No significant differences were found between CF, PF, and EBF post-treatment or from baseline; however, trends were observed toward lower absolute abundance in the post-treatment CF group compared to EBF (P = 0.063) and increased abundance in both the EBF (P = 0.074) and PF (P = 0.073) groups from baseline. Conclusions Our meta-analysis identified 12 eligible trials of non-HMO prebiotics. Trends were observed toward lower Bifidobacteria abundance in CF groups post-intervention and increases from baseline in the EBF and PF groups, but we failed to find significant post-intervention differences among CF, PF and EBF groups. We conclude that current evidence does not provide definitive support for use of non-HMO prebiotics to increase infant colonization with Bifidobacteria. Funding Sources The University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Environmental Health. Supporting Tables Images and/or Graphs

Keywords: bifidobacteria abundance; abundance; meta analysis; prebiotic supplemented; non hmo

Journal Title: Current developments in nutrition
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.