LAUSR

Empirical evidence on error processing comes from the comparison between errors and correct responses in general, but essential differences may exist between different error types. Typically, cognitive control tasks elicit errors without conflicts (congruent errors) and with conflicts (incongruent errors), which may employ different monitoring and adjustment mechanisms. However, the neural indicators that distinguish between both error types remain unclear. To solve this issue, behavioral and electrophysiological data were measured while subjects performed the flanker task. Results showed that a significant post-error improvement in accuracy on incongruent errors, but not on congruent errors. Theta and beta power were comparable between both error types. Importantly, the basic error-related alpha suppression (ERAS) effect was observed on both errors, whereas ERAS evoked by incongruent errors was greater than congruent errors, indicating that post-error attentional adjustments are both source-general and source-specific. And the brain activity in alpha band, but not theta or beta band, successfully decoded congruent and incongruent errors. Furthermore, improved post-incongruent error accuracy was predicted by a measure of post-error attentional adjustments, the alpha power. Together, these findings demonstrate that ERAS is a reliable neural indicator for identifying error types, and directly conduces to the improvement of post-error behavior.