LAUSR

Background Many patients started on antibiotics for possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) do not have pneumonia. Patients with minimal and stable ventilator settings may be suitable candidates for early antibiotic discontinuation. We compared outcomes among patients with suspected VAP but minimal and stable ventilator settings treated with 1-3 days vs >3 days of antibiotics. Methods We identified consecutive adult patients started on antibiotics for possible VAP with daily minimum positive end-expiratory pressure of ≤5 cm H2O and fraction of inspired oxygen ≤40% for at least 3 days within a large tertiary care hospital between 2006 and 2014. We compared time to extubation alive vs ventilator death and time to hospital discharge alive vs hospital death using competing risks models among patients prescribed 1-3 days vs >3 days of antibiotics. All models were adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, severity of illness, clinical signs of infection, and pathogens. Results There were 1290 eligible patients, 259 treated for 1-3 days and 1031 treated for >3 days. The 2 groups had similar demographics, comorbidities, and clinical signs. There were no significant differences between groups in time to extubation alive (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16 for short- vs long-course treatment; 95% confidence interval [CI], .98-1.36), ventilator death (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, .55-1.22]), time to hospital discharge alive (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, .91-1.26]), or hospital death (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, .75-1.31]). Conclusions Very short antibiotic courses (1-3 days) were associated with outcomes similar to longer courses (>3 days) in patients with suspected VAP but minimal and stable ventilator settings. Assessing serial ventilator settings may help clinicians identify candidates for early antibiotic discontinuation.