LAUSR

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common comorbidity in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), but co-existing AR has often been an exclusion criterion from major clinical trials. The impact of co-existing AR on the natural history of AS has not been well-described. We compared clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe AS with or without co-existing AR. Consecutive patients (n=1188) with index echocardiographic diagnosis of moderate to severe AS (AVA <1.5cm2) were studied. They were divided into those with co-existing AR (at least moderate severity) and those without. Adverse composite clinical outcomes were defined as either mortality or admissions for congestive cardiac failure on subsequent follow-up for at least five years. Appropriate univariate and multivariable analyses were employed to compare the two groups. There were 88 patients (7.4%) with co-existing AR and AS. These patients did not differ significantly in age, but had lower body mass index (22.9±3.8 vs 25.3±5.1 kg/m2). They also had lower diastolic blood pressure (68.7±10.7 vs 72.2±12.3 mmHg), larger end-diastolic volume index (68.8±18.8 vs 60.4±17.8 ml/m2) and left ventricular mass index (118.6±36.4 vs 108.9±33.1 g/m2). The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between the groups. Co-existing AR was associated with adverse outcomes (log-rank 4.20, p=0.040). On multivariable Cox-regression, co-existing AR remained independently associated with adverse outcomes (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.13–2.02) after adjusting for age, AS severity and left ventricular ejection fraction. In patients with AS, co-existing AR was associated with a distinct echocardiographic profile and adverse outcomes. Type of funding source: None