Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can lead to paravalvular leak (PVL) in 15% to 20% of cases, which remains an important prognostic factor and an independent predictor of mortality in… Click to show full abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can lead to paravalvular leak (PVL) in 15% to 20% of cases, which remains an important prognostic factor and an independent predictor of mortality in short and long-term follow-up. To evaluate feasibility and safety of oversizing Medtronic Self-Expandable Valve (Dvalve), calculated according to the aortic annulus maximal diameter (Dmax), on the incidence of PVL and in-hospital mortality after TAVI. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 610 patients treated with TAVI between January 2016 and December 2018. A group of 45 patients of the oversized group (October 2017 to December 2018) accordingly to the Dmax, when (Dvalve − Dmax) | <2 mm in the absence of contraindication was compared to a control group of 213 patients whose prosthesis size had been chosen according to the aortic annulus perimeter (January 2016 to September 2017). In the “oversized” group, no patient had a significant PVL after TAVI compared with the control group (0% vs. 7.51%; p=0.041). Balloon post-dilatation was significantly less frequent in the “oversized” group (0% vs. 10.3%; p=0.012). Per-procedural irradiation and the average length of in-hospital stay were significantly lower (PDS = 2,296.05±1,667.94 cGy·mm2 vs. 4,568±1,352.84 cGy·mm2; p<0.001; and 5.23±1.74 days vs. 6.33±3.23 days; p=0.029, respectively). No case of annulus rupture occurred in the “oversized” group. The incidences of high-degree atrioventricular block with definitive pacing and in-hospital mortality were similar between the two groups. Oversizing the self-expandable valve, according to the aortic annulus maximal diameter, significantly reduced PVL after TAVI, balloon post-dilatation, per-procedural irradiation, and the length of hospital stay, without increasing the risk of mechanical, rhythmic, conductive and coronary occlusion complications. It does not increase the in-hospital mortality rate either. Randomized controlled trials are needed to establish a firm conclusion about its feasibility and safety. Type of funding source: None
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.