LAUSR

Clinical significance of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) has not been well-studied. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prognostic impact of concomitant MR in patients with severe AS. We used the data of 3815 patients from the CURRENT AS registry, a retrospective multicenter registry of severe AS in Japan. We compared the clinical outcomes between patients with moderate/severe MR and with none/mild MR according to the initial treatment strategies (initial aortic valve replacement [AVR] or conservative strategy). The primary outcome measure was a composite of aortic valve-related death and heart failure hospitalisation. Among the study population, moderate/severe MR were observed in 227/1197 (19%) patients with initial AVR strategy and in 536/2618 (20%) patients with conservative strategy. Among survivors with the initial AVR strategy, moderate/severe MR improved in 61/62 (98%) patients with concomitant mitral procedures. The crude cumulative 5-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was significantly higher in patients with moderate/severe MR than in those with none/mild MR regardless of the treatment strategies (25.2% vs. 14.4%, P<0.001 in the initial AVR strategy; 63.3% vs 40.7%, P<0.001 in the conservative strategy). Multivariate analysis revealed moderate/severe MR at index echocardiography was independently associated with higher risk for the primary outcome measure in conservative strategy (adjusted HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.40, P=0.023), but not associated in the initial AVR strategy (adjusted HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.82–1.80, P=0.339). Moderate/severe MR was independently associated with poorer outcome in patients with severe AS who were managed conservatively, but not in those with initial AVR strategy. Type of funding source: None