LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Right ventricular longitudinal systolic strain as a tool to predict the progression to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertensive patients

Photo by mufidpwt from unsplash

Type of funding sources: None. Accurate assessment of right ventricular (RV) systolic function is important, as it is an established prognostic marker in cardiac diseases. Speckle-tracking echocardiography is a sensitive… Click to show full abstract

Type of funding sources: None. Accurate assessment of right ventricular (RV) systolic function is important, as it is an established prognostic marker in cardiac diseases. Speckle-tracking echocardiography is a sensitive tool for detection of subclinical left ventricular impairment in essential hypertension. Our aim was to investigate the usefulness of RV longitudinal peak systolic strain (GLS) to predict the risk of future development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in patients with essential hypertension. We performed a retrospective observational study that included 453 patients with essential hypertension (266 males, aged 63 ± 18 years) and 175 normotensives (100 males, aged 66 ± 15 years). Standard echocardiography was performed at the initial visit. 2D speckle tracking echocardiography with evaluation of longitudinal strain in each segment of the RV (basal: RVLS-B; mid: RVLS-M, apical: RVLS-A) and global RV free-wall strain (RVLS-G) were also performed. We studied the cases of new onset HFpEF in hypertensive patients. The median follow up was 85 months (22–122). RVLS-G, RVLS-B and RVLS-M were significantly impaired in hypertensives compared to controls (RVLS-G: -16.1 ± 9.7 vs -20.0 ± 5.1, RVLS-B: -11.7 ± 3.7 vs -20.6 ± 3.3, RVLS-M:-16.3 ± 5.4 vs -20.7 ± 4.9, p < 0.05 for all). No significant difference was detected for the RVLS-A (-20.1 ± 3.8 for hypertensives vs -21.31 ± 6.5 for controls, p=NS). Thirty two hypertensive patients developed HFpEF (7 %). A cut-off RVLS-G worse than -17 % was significantly associated with new onset HFpEF (p< 0.001) in those patients. A multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that RVLS-G had independent significant prognostic value for the risk of HFpEF (HR: 10.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3-25.4). Essential hypertension leads to a decrease of RVLS which is strong predictor of a new onset HFpEF. Future studies are needed to assess the significance of these findings and the effects of treatment.

Keywords: rvls; systolic strain; essential hypertension; hypertensive patients; strain; right ventricular

Journal Title: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.