LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Predictors of success of elective electrical cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Photo from wikipedia

Type of funding sources: None. Electrical cardioversion is an effective therapy for the restoration of sinus rhythm. The success of cardioversion has been related to different clinical and echocardiographic variables,… Click to show full abstract

Type of funding sources: None. Electrical cardioversion is an effective therapy for the restoration of sinus rhythm. The success of cardioversion has been related to different clinical and echocardiographic variables, although the available evidence is scarce and heterogeneous. Ambispective, observational, single-center registry that consecutively included 271 patients scheduled for elective electrical cardioversion (ECV) on the inpatient ward for atrial fibrilation (AF) or flutter fibrilation (AFL) >48 hours of onset during the years 2018-2021. All patients scheduled for CVE that were ultimately discontinued on the day of the procedure were excluded, finally analyzing 244 patients. The baseline characteristics are shown in Picture 1. No statistically significant differences were observed in the main comorbidities, cardiovascular risk factors, CHAD2S2-VASc scale, the position of the paddles, or days to ECV between patients with successful ECV and those with a failed procedure. Neither were they observed in terms of pharmacological treatment, including the presence of previous antiarrhythmic treatment as part of a facilitated ECV strategy (Picture 2). Moderately-severely depressed systolic function and the presence of moderate-severe mitral regurgitation were associated with a higher rate of cardioversion failure (3% vs 2.6% p= 0.002; 3.3% vs 1.3% p=0.001), higher number of biphasic electric shocks (1.3 vs 1.6 p<0.001; 1.2 vs 1.6 p<0.001) and higher total voltage received (245J vs 310J p=0.32; 229J vs 325J p<0.001). Moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation was also associated with lower cardioversion success rate (96.7% vs 85% p=0.02) although no differences were seen with respect to the number of shocks or energy received. On the other hand, severe left atrial dilatation, although it had a neutral impact on the success of ECV, was associated with greater immediate recurrence (<5 minutes after ECV) (4.2% vs 50% p<0.001). Patients with moderate-severe systolic dysfunction and significant mitral and tricuspid regurgitation have a lower success rate of ECV. Previous antiarrhythmic therapy presents a neutral effect on sinus rhythm restoration and immediate recurrence.

Keywords: electrical cardioversion; cardioversion; success; moderate severe; elective electrical; flutter

Journal Title: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Year Published: 2023

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.