LAUSR

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) Background Heart rate (HR) is generated by spontaneous electrical activity in the sinoatrial node (SAN) and is modulated by the autonomic nervous system. During sympathetic stimulation, the activation of β-adrenergic receptors (βAR) increases cAMP levels, leading to positive chronotropic effect. Among the 6 cardiac cAMP-PDE families, PDE4 is critical for controlling excitation-contraction coupling (ECC) during β-stimulation in atrial and ventricular myocytes. PDE4 may also be important for automaticity. 3 genes encode for PDE4 in the heart (pde4a, 4b, 4d). We propose to investigate their respective contribution to the regulation of pacemaker activity.  Methods Total PDE activity in mouse SAN was determined as the cAMP-hydrolytic activity measured in the absence of PDE inhibitor and the fraction corresponding to PDE4 activity was assessed by including the PDE4 inhibitor Ro-20-1724. The in vitro pacemaker activity was assessed by measuring spontaneous Ca2+ transients in Fluo4-loaded-SAN tissue from wild-type (WT) and PDE4KO mice. Images were obtained using confocal microscopy. Telemetry EKG was recorded in conscious mice in control (CTRL) conditions, after pharmacological denervation with atropine (1 mg/kg) and propranolol (2 mg/kg) and after β-stimulation with isoproterenol (ISO, 1.5 mg/kg). HR variability was evaluated by calculating the SDNN (standard deviation of RR intervals) parameter. Results Ro-20-1724 (10 µM) increased beating rate of intact SAN and increased PKA-phosphorylation of key ECC actors (ryanodine receptor, phospholamban and contractile proteins). PDE4 activity was found to account for 60% of total cAMP-PDE activity in SAN. PDE4A, 4B and 4D isoforms were found to be expressed in mouse SAN. In PDE4BKO SAN, the effect of ISO on SAN beating rate was higher than in WT. Ablation of PDE4D induced decreased beating rate in CTRL and ISO conditions and increased Ca2+ spark frequency compared to WT SAN. In vivo, PDE4BKO and PDE4DKO mice displayed increased resting HR during day and night. HR variability was decreased in PDE4BKO, but not in PDE4DKO mice during the day, and decreased in both genotypes at night compared to WT mice. After atropine + propranolol denervation, the rhythmic phenotype was only maintained in PDE4BKO but not in PDE4DKO mice. The response to β-AR stimulation with ISO was higher in PDE4BKO than in PDE4DKO. In addition, under ISO we observed an increased number of premature beats and atrioventricular blocks in PDE4DKO, but not in PDE4BKO mice. Conclusion PDE4B and PDE4D differentially regulate cardiac pacemaker activity. While PDE4B clearly controls intrinsic SAN automaticity, PDE4D might be important for ANS-mediated regulation of HR and conduction.