Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Union. Background Overweight and obese people have a higher risk of acquiring heart failure,… Click to show full abstract
Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Union. Background Overweight and obese people have a higher risk of acquiring heart failure, however these patients tend to have more favorable outcome, a phenomenon known as the obesity paradox. Purpose We aimed to investigate the risk of obesity and the association of body mass index (BMI) on all-cause mortality in heart failure CRT patients at long-term. Methods We examined retrospectively 1585 patients undergoing CRT implantation at our clinic between 2000-2020 with their BMI available at baseline. Patients were sorted into three groups: normal weight (BMI ‹25), overweight (BMI 25-29.9) and obese (BMI≥30). The composite primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, heart transplantation or implantation of a left ventricular assist device. Time-to-event data was studied by log-rank and multivariate Cox regression analysis. We studied peri-procedural complication rates, and reverse remodeling, defined as a ≥15% relative increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) within 6 months after CRT implantation. Results During our mean follow-up time of 5.1 years, 973 (61%) reached our primary endpoint, 302 (66%) in the BMI ‹25 group, 389 (61%) in the BMI 25-29.9 group and 282 (58%) in the BMI≥30 group. Obese patients showed mortality benefit over normal-weighed patients (HR 0.78; 95%CI 0.66-0.92; p=0.003), with only a trend in overweight patients over normal-weighed patients (HR 0.86; 95%CI 0.74-1.00; p=0.05). At multivariate analysis, BMI ‹25 patients showed a 19% higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to overweight and obese patients (HR 1.19; 95%CI 1.03-1.38; p=0.02) after adjusting for age, sex, NYHA class, diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation. Obese and overweight patients were younger than normal-weighed patients (68yrs. vs. 69yrs. vs. 70 yrs.; p‹0.0001), similar sex distribution can be seen. Diabetes (BMI ‹25 48% vs. BMI 25-29.9 37% vs. BMI≥30 26%; p‹0.0001) and hypertension (BMI ‹25 82% vs. BMI 25-29.9 74% vs. BMI≥30 71%; p‹0.001) occurred more frequently in obese and overweight patients. Obese and overweight patients had a higher LVEF than in the normal weight group (30% vs. 28% vs. 27%; p‹0.001), respectively. Peri-procedural complication rates did not differ in the three groups. In all patient groups, a significant improvement in LVEF at 6 months was seen (BMI ‹25 ∆-EF 7%, BMI 25-29.9 ∆-EF 7.5%, and BMI ≥30 ∆-EF 6; p<0.001). No difference was seen in the proportion of developing reverse remodeling (BMI ‹25 58% vs. BMI 25-29.9 61% vs. BMI≥30 57%; p=0.75). Conclusions Despite having more co-morbidities like diabetes or hypertension, obese patients showed mortality benefit over normal-weighed patients proving, that the obesity paradox was present in our CRT patient cohort at long-term. Peri-procedural complications did not occur more frequently in obese or overweight patients. Echocardiographic response did not vary, similar reverse remodeling was observed across the patient groups.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.