LAUSR

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Characterizing atrial substrate and conduction properties is crucial to treat complex arrhythmias during catheter ablations. Unipolar and bipolar electrogram signals are routinely used with significant limits due to low detailed mapping, the impact of poor contact and far-field electrical signals. Moreover, signals morphology is dependent on the relative orientation of the catheter inter-electrode axis to the direction of activation. Omnipolar signals try to overcome this direction-dependence by using three adjacent electrodes to infer directional information about the local electric field. Purpose We compared omnipolar mapping (OM) signals with the traditional high-density bipolar mapping (BM) ones. Methods All the procedures were performed using a high-density grid-designed mapping catheter. The atypical left atrial flutters were mapped using both OM and BM configuration. All the analysis about voltage and potential duration are related to the entire left atrial surface excluding pulmonary veins. Results Ten atypical atrial flutters were mapped in the left atrium in seven patients (median age 70 y, 5 males). OM identified 7 double loops and 3 triple loops while BM identified 7 double loops, 2 triple loops and 1 single loop, missing 2 critical circuits (an example is shown in figure 1) Significant differences were present also in potentials amplitude (peak-to-peak voltage amplitude) in the critical isthmus with OM higher than BM (OM median 0.22 mV IQR [0.16 – 0.30] vs BM median 0.19 mV IQR [0.13 – 0.24], P= 0.002). Dense scar area (defined as voltage amplitude <0.05 mV) identified with OM was smaller compared to BM (1.3 cm2 IQR [0.13-1.73] vs 1.7 cm2 IQR [0.23-3.10]; P= 0.06). OM showed longer signal duration (+10.1%) compared to BM in the entire left atrium and in particular the mean signal duration in the critical isthmus (OM median 79.1 ms IQR [70.7 – 88.9] vs BM median 62.5 ms IQR [55.2 – 85.2], P= 0.006). Percentage of tachycardia cycle lenght (TCL) mapped at the critical isthmus (maximum signal duration at the isthmus/ TCL) was greater with OM than BM (OM mean 60% ± 11%, BM mean 54% ± 12% (P= 0.02)(a summary of the results are shown in table 1). Conclusions OM identifies higher amplitude and longer signal duration especially in the critical isthmus region also reducing the extension of dense scar area. This finding may be crucial in the definition of complex and localized reentrant activities, leading to a faster and more precise catheter ablation. Table 1 Figure 1